KENYA · GUIDE 0591 · EDITION 4.2
Website accessibility audit in Kenya
Assess a website against an agreed accessibility scope and report evidence.
A CONCRETE EXAMPLE · ILLUSTRATIVE
Fictional accessibility review A11Y-91 examines five pages and one enquiry journey on a small business site: home, services, process, about and contact. Output is a scoped issue register with URL, reproduction steps, user impact, evidence and proposed remedy. Example finding: 'On contact page, keyboard focus reaches Send but no visible focus indicator appears.' It is a preliminary practical review, not full WCAG conformance certification. Remediation, legal assurance and testing every browser/assistive technology are excluded unless separately agreed.
Who is the first customer?
Businesses and organizations improving user access.
Test the offer
Review a few representative pages and a key task.
What your operating pack contains
- A business-specific operating guide PDF
- Offline itemised costing and quotation tool
- Supplier request and sales message drafts
- Job-card and quality-response documents
- Offline operations desk: supplier comparison, work checkpoints, accepted deliveries and cash tracking
- Cashflow and launch review: downside scenarios, break-even, 13-week cash plan and trial decision
- Source register and unresolved checks
Delivery and quality
Findings have page references and evidence; an audit is not a blanket compliance certificate.
Cost drivers
- page types
- manual testing
- report depth
Use your own supplier quotations. Worked figures in the pack are illustrative and do not establish a verified startup budget or profit forecast.
Evidence and scope
Evaluating Web Accessibility Overview — W3C WAI ↗
Human evaluation required; tools alone do not establish conformance. · Checked 2026-10-26
Forms Tutorial — W3C WAI ↗
Labels, instructions and clear form structure. · Checked 2026-10-26
Images Tutorial ↗
Purpose-based text alternatives; does not validate marketing performance. · Checked 2026-10-26